Friday, May 30, 2008

Fictional Archaeology: The Dig

As the Guardian Hay Festival 2008 draws to a close it is worth drawing attention to John Preston's The Dig (Penguin 2007). This is set on the excavation of Sutton Hoo in the summer of 1939.

Publisher's Synopsis:

In the long hot summer of 1939 Britain is preparing for war. But on a riverside farm in Suffolk there is excitement of another kind: Mrs Petty, the widowed farmer, has had her hunch proved correct that the strange mounds on her land hold buried treasure. As the dig proceeds against a background of mounting national anxiety, it becomes clear though that this is no ordinary find... And pretty soon the discovery leads to all kinds of jealousies and tensions.

John Preston's recreation of the Sutton Hoo dig - the greatest Anglo-Saxon discovery ever in Britain - brilliantly and comically dramatizes three months of intense activity when locals fought outsiders, professionals thwarted amateurs, and love and rivaly flourished in equal measure.

Listen to John Preston talking about The Dig on BBC's "Open Book".

Monday, May 26, 2008

Mobile Learning and Heritage

The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales (RCAHMW) has published a bilingual booklet on using mobile devices in heritage interpretation (see press release). The report is by Tom Pert, the mapping officer for RCAHMW.

The report starts with three case studies (Roman, Medieval, Industrial):
There is then a section on hardware:
  • Mobile Phones
  • PDAs
  • Smartphones
  • MP3, Media Players and Portable Games Consoles
There is an emphasis on PDAs with the comment that ownership is expected to increase. (There was some reservation about the future use of PDAs at the pre-MLearn 2008 consultation in January 2008.) And what about iPods? (See also the downloadable audio tour for Maiden Castle from the English Heritage website.)

The final three sections deal with Provision and Maintenance; Future Directions; Broadening the Application - the Value of Mobile Devices. I was also pleased to see a section on accessibility including the use of mobile technologies 'where physical access to a site or landscape is problematic for a user'. There is a section on multi-media software (Windows) used to produce the resources. (Mac users will find that they already have the resources they need to create podcasts.) I was a little surprised to see that there was no apparent discussion of RSS feeds for podcasts.

There is a useful bibliography and list of websites (though a single online page of links from the RCAHMW website would have been even better).

The press release includes an endorsement for Swansea's Professor Ralph Griffiths, chairman of RCAHMW:
We now hope other historic landscapes, in town and countryside, can be opened up in a similar way to Ruthin and Blaenavon, marrying the latest technology with tangible sites on the ground, and so to extend our public spaces that are both safe and fascinating for youngsters and adults alike.

The Royal Commission stands ready to do so along with partners, be they communities or businesses, schools, colleges or universities, or the museums, archives and libraries linked to them. It couldn’t be more appropriate that the first of the Commission’s publications in this, its Centenary year, should be on a subject that looks ahead into its second century.
Pert, T. 2008. Hanes wrth law: Defnyddio dyfeisiau symudol i ddehongli treftadaeth / History in your hands: using mobile devices in heritage interpretation. Aberystwyth: Comisiwn Brenhinol Henebion Cymru / The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales. ISBN 978-1-871184-30-3. 48 pp. £4.95 (including UK postage). [How to order]

Friday, May 23, 2008

New British Biographies for the Ancient World: May 2008

Some new on-line biographies for members of the Roman garrison at Vindolanda, and a collector from the Grant Tour have appeared in the latest update (May 2008) of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (and see January 2008 update):
Access is via Athens password.

"Digital Heritage in the New Knowledge Environment

This should be of interest to some on this list.




1ST Announcement – Call for Papers/Participation

The Directorate of the National Archive of Monuments of the Hellenic Ministry of
Culture is organizing a three-day Conference on

“Digital Heritage in the new knowledge environment:
shared spaces & open paths to cultural content”.

The Conference, which is going to be held in the end of October 2008, intends to
promote a dialogue on current issues and concerns raised regarding the new
knowledge environment, as this is formed by the use of new media for heritage
management and dissemination.

The discussion will grow around five sessions addressing

a) Case studies of new technologies applied in Archaeology and Heritage
b) Activity towards the formation of a common language to ensure
compatibility and interoperability of applications and systems,
c) The use of Web 2.0 as part of the new knowledge environment,
d) Free, open and public access to heritage content
e) Theoretical approaches to cultural heritage and digital culture.

As part of the above sessions, keynote talks have been invited and will be
presented by notable researchers and specialists, including:

Dr Adam-Veleni, Director, Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki
Dr Dallas C., Assistant Professor, Panteion University
Dr Constantios D., Director, Byzantine & Christian Museum
Dr Constantopoulos P, Professor, Athens University of Economics & Business
Dr Cotsakis C, Professor, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Dr Tourta A., Director, Byzantine Museum of Thessaloniki
Farmakis G., Chief Executive Officer, Agilis S.A.
Dr Ashley M., Executive Director, OKAPI, Multimedia Authoring Center for Teaching
in Anthropology, UC Berkeley
Dr Brogan T., Director, Institute for Aegean Prehistory Study Centre for East
Crete (INSTAP)
Dr Doerr M., Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research & Technology
Mr Ducke B., Senior Applications Support and Development Officer, Oxford
Dr Elliott T., Associate Director for Digital Programs, Institute for the Study of
the Ancient World, New York University
Mr Eve S., Director, L-P Archaeology
Mr Isaksen L., Doctoral Student at School of Electronics and Computer Science,
University of Southampton, Ántiquist Community Moderator, formerly Senior IT
Development Officer at Oxford Archaeology
Dr Kansa E., Executive Director, Information and Service Design (ISD), School of
Information, UC Berkeley
Mr Poole Í., Chief Executive, MDA (Europe)

For further information on the Conference and the thematic sessions please see the
attached file.

We invite all interested to participate with a 15-minute original presentation in
Greek or English to send the title and a 350-word abstract of their talk until 9th
June 2008, including the title of the thematic session under which they wish to be
considered. The selection of papers will be based on the extent of the abstract,
the abstract consistency with the conference theme, and the post date. The
conference presentations will be published in a volume by the Hellenic Ministry of
Culture. Please send abstracts to Ms Kappa by email to, by post
to the Directorate of the National Archive of Monuments offices, Ag. Asomaton 11,
Athens, GR-105 53, Hellas, by fax to +30 210 322 5628. Participants will be
notified by 30th June 2008.

The exact conference dates, as well as a preliminary programme will be announced
in July 2008.

We are looking forward to hearing from you, and please do not hesitate to contact
us for any further enquiries.

Metaxia Tsipopoulou, Ph.D.
Hellenic Ministry of Culture
National Archive of Monuments

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

AWOL - The Ancient World Online - 4

Future issues of AWOL have moved to a new home

AWOL - The Ancient World Online

Propylaeum-DOK - Digital Repository Classical Studies is the developing full-text server of the Virtual Library of Classical Studies and is made available by the University Library of Heidelberg. It offers members of the academic community worldwide the opportunity to publish their texts in electronic format on the internet at no charge. All kinds of publications (like monographs, articles, lectures) in the fields of Classical Studies can be stored on 'Propylaeum-DOK'. The standard of these publications should not fall below that of traditional printed ones. The documents will be stored and their long-term availability guaranteed by using standardized addresses (URN) and metadata (OAIPMH). They are accessible through the German union catalogues and search engines.

The website “Was gestatten Verlage bei der Selbstarchivierung im Open Access?“ delivers information if a publishing house permits to publish articles already published (postprints) or to publish preprints as a parallel version on Propylaeum-DOK.

Listed here are the contents of Propylaeum-DOK as of May 20, 2008, organized in topical lists. Note that there is some overlap between the lists.

Egyptology (16 titles)

Ancient History (31 titles)

Classical Archaeology (20 titles)

Classical Philology (5 titles)

Prehistoric Archaeology (8 titles)

AWOL - The Ancient World Online - 1
AWOL - The Ancient World Online - 2
AWOL - The Ancient World Online - 3
AWOL - The Ancient World Online - 4
AWOL - The Ancient World Online - 5
AWOL - The Ancient World Online - 6
AWOL - The Ancient World Online - 7

Future issues of AWOL have moved to a new home

AWOL - The Ancient World Online

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Bamboo and reactions

I was among those taken somewhat by surprise by the announcement of the Project Bamboo workshops a little earlier this Spring.

There has been quite a lot of off line chatter about it, and yesterday Melissa Terras made some interesting comments in Bamboozle. I direct you also to the 18 minute podcast featuring an interview with Chad Kainz, Senior Director of NSIT Academic Technologies at the University of Chicago and David A. Greenbaum, Director of Data Services at the University of California, Berkely. It was recorded at the CNI 2008 Spring Task Force Meeting in Minneapolis, Minnesota where they presented a session entitled, "Bamboo - Community-Defined Shared Services and Cyberinfrastructure for the Arts & Humanities".

"Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An In-depth Study of Faculty Needs and Ways of Meeting Them"

This is worth reading:

Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An In-depth Study of Faculty Needs and Ways of Meeting Them

Principal Investigator Diane Harley, Ph.D., Senior Researcher
Research Associates: Sarah Earl-Novell, Ph.D., Sophia Krzys
Acord, Shannon Lawrence, Principal Investigator C. Judson King,
Professor, Provost Emeritus and Director


The Center for Studies in Higher Education, with generous funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, is conducting research to understand the needs and desires of faculty for in-progress scholarly communication (i.e., forms of communication employed as research is being executed) as well as archival publication. In the interest of developing a deeper understanding of how and why scholars do what they do to advance their fields, as well as their careers, our approach focuses on fine-grained analyses of faculty values and behaviors throughout the scholarly communication lifecycle, including sharing, collaborating, publishing, and engaging with the public. Well into our second year, we have posted a draft interim report describing some of our early results and impressions based on the responses of more than 150 interviewees in the fields of astrophysics, archaeology, biology, economics, history, music, and political science.

Our work to date has confirmed the important impact of disciplinary culture and tradition on many scholarly
communication habits. These traditions may override the perceived "opportunities" afforded by new technologies, including those falling into the Web 2.0 category. As we have listened to our diverse informants, as well as followed closely the
prognostications about the likely future of scholarly communication, we note that it is absolutely imperative to be
precise about terms. That includes being clear about what is meant by "open access" publishing (i.e., using preprint or
postprint servers for work published in prestigious outlets, versus publishing in new, untested open access journals, or the
more casual individual posting of working papers, blogs, and other non-peer-reviewed work). Our work suggests that enthusiasm for technology development and adoption should not be conflated with the hard reality of tenure and promotion requirements (including the needs and goals of final archival publication) in highly competitive professional environments.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Import Restrictions Imposed on Archaeological and Ethnological Material of Iraq

This is the full text of the document published in Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 84/Wednesday, April 30, 2008/Rules and Regulations, pages 23335-23342

Import Restrictions Imposed on Archaeological and Ethnological Material of Iraq

AGENCIES: Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This document amends the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations to reflect the imposition of import restrictions on Archaeological and Ethnological Material of Iraq pursuant to section 3002 of the Emergency Protection for Iraqi Cultural Antiquities Act of 2004. This document also contains the Designated List of Archaeological and Ethnological Material that describes the types of articles to which the import restrictions apply.

DATES: Effective Date: April 30, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For legal aspects, George F. McCray, Esq., Chief, Intellectual Property Rights and Restricted Merchandise Branch, (202) 572–8710. For operational aspects, Michael Craig, Chief, Federal Agency Enforcement Branch, (202) 863–6558.



The value of cultural property, whether archaeological or ethnological in nature, is immeasurable. Such items often constitute the very essence of a society and convey important information concerning a people’s origin, history, and traditional setting. The importance and popularity of such items regrettably makes them targets of theft, encourages clandestine looting of archaeological sites, and results in their illegal export and import.

The United States shares in the international concern for the need to protect endangered cultural property. The appearance in the U.S. of stolen or illegally exported artifacts from other countries where there has been pillage has, on occasion, strained our foreign and cultural relations. This situation, combined with the concerns of museum, archaeological, and scholarly communities, was recognized by the President and Congress. It became apparent that it was in the national interest of the U.S. to join with other countries to control illegal trafficking of such articles in international commerce.

The United States joined international efforts and actively participated in deliberations resulting in the 1970 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (823 U.N.T.S. 231 (1972)). United States acceptance of the 1970 UNESCO Convention was codified into U.S. law as the ‘‘Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act’’ (Pub. L. 97–446, 19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) This was done to promote U.S. leadership in achieving greater international cooperation towards preserving cultural treasures that are of importance to the nations from which they originate and to achieve greater international understanding of mankind’s common heritage.

During the past several years, import restrictions have been imposed on archaeological and ethnological artifacts of a number of signatory nations. These restrictions have been imposed as a result of requests received from those nations under Article 9 of the 1970 Convention and pursuant to provisions of the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act that allow for emergency action and bilateral agreements between the United States and other countries.

U.N. Security Council Resolution 1483

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483, adopted on May 23, 2003, obligates all member nations, regardless of whether they are parties to the 1970 UNESCO Convention, to assist in the protection of Iraq’s cultural heritage.

Paragraph 7 of the Resolution states that ‘‘all Member States shall take appropriate steps to facilitate the safe return to Iraqi institutions of Iraqi cultural property and other items of archaeological, historical, cultural, rare scientific, and religious importance illegally removed from the Iraq National Museum, the National Library, and other locations in Iraq since the adoption of resolution 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, including by establishing a prohibition on trade in or transfer of such items with respect to which reasonable suspicion exists that they have been illegally removed, and calls upon the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Interpol, and other international organizations, as appropriate, to assist in the implementation of this paragraph;’’.

Emergency Protection for Iraqi Cultural Antiquities Act of 2004

The Emergency Protection for Iraqi Cultural Antiquities Act of 2004 (title III of Pub. L. 108–429) (‘‘the Act’’) authorizes the President to exercise the authority of the President under section 304 of the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2603) with respect to any archaeological or ethnological material of Iraq without regard to whether Iraq is a State Party under the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act, and without the need for a formal request from the government of Iraq.

Under 19 U.S.C. 2603, if the President determines that an emergency condition applies with respect to any archaeological or ethnological material of any State Party, the President may apply the import restrictions set forth in 19 U.S.C. 2606 with respect to such material.

In Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, entitled Assignment of Functions Relating to Import Restrictions on Iraqi Antiquities, dated May 5, 2006 (71 FR 28753), the President assigned the functions of the President under section 3002 of the Act to the Secretary of State.

In Delegation of Authority No. 294, published in the Federal Register on July 20, 2006 (71 FR 41306), the Secretary of State delegated to the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, to the extent authorized by law, all authorities and functions vested in the Deputy Secretary of State, including all authorities and functions vested in the Secretary of State or the head of agency that have been or may be delegated or re-delegated to the Deputy Secretary.

In Delegation of Authority No. 296, published in the Federal Register on February 22, 2007 (72 FR 8054), the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs delegated to the Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs the functions of the President under section 3002 of the Act.

Pursuant to section 304 of the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2603) and section 3002 of the Act, the Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State, concluding that an emergency condition applies with respect to archaeological and ethnological materials of Iraq, made the necessary determination on July 2, 2007, to impose import restrictions on such materials of Iraq. Accordingly, CBP is amending 19 CFR part 12 to reflect the imposition of the import restrictions. The Designated List of Archaeological and Ethnological Material of Iraq that describes the types of articles to which the import restrictions apply is set forth below. This list is for general guidance only and is not intended to be all- inclusive.

More information on import restrictions may be obtained from the International Cultural Property Protection Web site ( Importation of archaeological and ethnological materials of Iraq are restricted unless the conditions set forth in 19 U.S.C. 2606 and 19 CFR 12.104c are met. These restrictions are in effect until further notice.

Designated List of Archeological and Ethnological Material of Iraq

Table of Contents

I. Ceramic
II. Stone
III. Metal
IV. Glass
V. Ivory, Bone, Shell
VI. Stucco
VII. Painting
VIII. Textiles
IX. Paper, Parchment, Leather
X. Wood


Neolithic (c. 6800–5500 BC)
Chalcolithic (c. 5500–3000 BC)
Early Bronze Age (c. 3000–2000 BC)
Middle Bronze Age (c. 2000–1600 BC)
Late Bronze Age (c. 1600–1200 BC)
Iron Age (c. 1200–330 BC)
Late Assyrian (c. 900–612 BC)
Achaemenid Persian (539–331 BC)
Hellenistic-Seleucid (331–138 BC)
Parthian (138 BC–AD 224)
Sasanian (AD 224–636)
Islamic (AD 636–present)
Umayyad (AD 661–750)
Abbasid (AD 750–1258)

I. Ceramic

A Introduction

This category includes objects of both fired and unfired clay. Types commonly encountered include cuneiform tablets, cones, and bricks (I.B.2, 3, and 4), figurines and plaques (I.C.1 and 2), incantation bowls (I.D.7.a), and beads (I.F.1).

Inscriptions, Writing

1. Cuneiform characters are written either with patterns of small impressed triangles or with incised pictographs. Any object bearing such writing has a strong likelihood of having come from Iraq.

2. Tablets: Covered with cuneiform characters, they are usually unbaked and must be handled with extreme care. Shapes range from very small rounded disk forms, to small square and rectangular pillow-shaped forms, to larger rectangular tablets. Approximate sizes are from 3 x 3 cm to 20 x 30 cm, though some can be larger. They sometimes occur with an enclosing clay envelope, which is also inscribed. Both tablets and envelopes may be impressed with cylinder or stamp seals (see II.B and C).

3. Cones: The large end is sometimes flat, sometimes mushroom shaped. Inscribed cuneiform characters can cover the head and/or body of the cone. Approximately 15 cm long.

4. Bricks may be inscribed or stamped with cuneiform inscriptions that are often placed in small frames on one of the sides. Approximately 30 x 30 x 10 cm.

5. Cylinders: Large cuneiform- inscribed objects can take the form of a multisided prism or barrel. The inscription typically covers all sides of the object. Approximately 20–30 cm high.

C. Sculpture

1. Plaques: Particularly common in the 2nd millennium BC are clay plaques made from molds and depicting a wide range of scenes in relief, including standing deities, musicians, animals, and mythological, ritual, and erotic images. Decorated on only one side, most are small enough to be easily held in the hand. Approximately 8–15 cm high.

2. Figurines: Terracotta figurines occur in all periods from the Neolithic through the Sasanian.

a. Chalcolithic figurines include Halaf style, characterized by seated naked females (usually headless), with bulging, rounded legs, arms, and breasts, and occasionally with painted decorations on their bodies; and Ubaid style of elongated, standing, nude male and female figures with tall, conical heads, ‘‘coffee-bean’’-shaped eyes, and applied body ornaments.

b. Later figurine types are either hand- made or mold-made, typically nude, frontal females. Figurines of gods and goddesses that show seated or standing deities with horned helmets are most common at the end of the 3rd and beginning of the 2nd millennium. Small, naturalistically-rendered, painted animal and human terracottas are distinctive of the Kassite period at the end of the 2nd millennium. Approximately 5–20 cm high.

c. Animal figurines, usually four- legged animals such as cows and horses, occur in all periods. Also occurring are relatively large-scale hollow figures of animals (up to about 70 cm high), either unglazed or glazed, seated or standing, most often of lions.

d. Small, mold-made freestanding supernatural human figures and figures of dogs, often with cuneiform inscriptions, are characteristic of the 1st millennium. Approximately 5–15 cm high.

e. Figurines of the Seleucid through Sasanian periods, including reclining female nudes and ladies wearing drapery, display varying degrees of influence from the Greco-Roman tradition. Terracotta molded figures, especially heads, are common in the Seleucid period. Approximately 2–10 cm high.

3. Models and Miscellaneous:

a. Models include furniture, such as chairs and beds, chariots, boats, and buildings. Approximately 5–20 cm or larger.

b. Molds used for casting metal objects and clay plaques and figures also occur.

c. Oil lamps and bathtub- and slipper- shaped coffins appear in the Hellenistic through Sasanian periods.

d. Some stamp and cylinder seals are made from fired clay, faience, or a composite material related to faience.

e. Terracotta theatrical masks made from molds are a common feature of the Parthian period.

D. Vessels

1. General: The ceramic tradition in Iraq is among the oldest in the world, extending back some 9000 years and encompassing a tremendous variety of shapes, fabrics, and decorative treatments. Only the most distinctive types are listed here. If in doubt, an expert should be consulted.

2. Neolithic vessels.

a. General characteristics: Unglazed bichrome pottery having a buff body decorated with dark paint. Decoration consists of geometric patterns, sometimes based on human, animal, and plant forms.

b. Ceramic Neolithic: Hand-made, burnished or painted with simple designs of geometric patterns such as obliquely arranged lines, chevrons, herring-bones, or ‘‘tadpole’’ pattern. Forms include bowls, cups, and open- mouthed jars with flat bases and curved or angled sides. Also common are undecorated, heavily tempered wares and cream or white slips. Approximately 8–30 cm in diameter.

c. Hassuna: Hand-made, burnished, incised, painted, and coarse wares in cream, buff or greenish fabrics. Decorations take geometric shapes, such as triangles and zig-zags, that can be arranged in multiple zones of running patterns. Forms include low, open
bowls, globular jars, and shallow corrugated-bottomed ‘‘husking’’ trays. Approximately 12–30 cm in diameter.

d. Samarra: Most commonly hand- made deep or shallow bowls, pedestaled bowls and jars decorated in matt brown or grey on smoothed buff slip with narrow zones of geometric designs reminiscent of basketry. The interior is often painted with humans or animals in simplified geometric forms arranged in circular or whirligig compositions. Approximately 12–30 cm in diameter.

3. Chalcolithic vessels.

a. General characteristics: Unglazed bichrome pottery having a buff body decorated with dark paint, and polychrome pottery having a buff body decorated with red, black, and white paint. Decoration consists of geometric patterns, sometimes including motifs from nature.

b. Halaf: Hand-made polychrome pottery, often polished to a high sheen. Complex compositions of geometric and natural motifs in red, orange, brown/ black, and white reminiscent of textiles, sometimes incorporating dense patterns of tiny black dots. Forms include plates, shallow bowls, footed goblets, and jars with flaring necks and oval mouth. Approximately 20–30 cm in diameter.

c. Earlier Ubaid: Hand-made wares, including fine buff or cream-slipped fabric decorated with thick dark paint with zones of geometric designs such as parallel lines in different directions, zigzags, and chevrons. Forms include bowls with and without ring bases, large dishes, sauceboats, beakers, and globular jars. Approximately 10–30 cm in diameter.

d. Later Ubaid: Wheel-made pottery often of a greenish hue, decorated with fine monochrome dark paint, used sparingly in broad black horizontal lines and simple curving shapes. Forms include large globular jars, shallow flaring bowls, round-bottomed bowls, and cups with flat bases. Approximately 4–20 cm in diameter.

e. Uruk: Burnished or polished monochrome (red-slipped or grey) wares, typically undecorated and mass- produced (wheel-made). Jars of this period often have bulging bellies, large mouths, short necks, and occasionally tubular spouts on the shoulder. A standardized, small, hand-made coarse ware bowl with a beveled rim also appears commonly. Approximately 5– 20 cm in diameter and 5–40 cm high.

4. Early Bronze Age vessels.

a. Jemdet Nasr: polychrome painted vessels with tightly packed geometric patterns, usually confined to the shoulder and predominately plum-red in color.

b. Scarlet Ware: polychrome painted globular jars, often with handles and bulging bellies, with red and black geometric designs, human figures, and animals.

c. Ninevite 5: decorations include incised and excised geometric shapes, or dark brown painted designs.

d. Many vessels are undecorated or simply incised in a single zone. Large vessels may have decorations around their necks, such as incisions or small, applied animals. Zoomorphic forms also occur, including cow, bird, and fish shapes. Approximately 10–40 cm in diameter and 8–50 cm high.

5. Middle and Late Bronze Age vessels.

a. Mostly undecorated wares.

b. Mitannian ware (also called Nuzi, Alalakh, or Hurrian ware): tall goblets with small, button bases, painted light floral and geometric designs on a dark (red or brown) background. Approximately 10–20 cm high.

c. Jars, vases, beakers, and flasks, painted in black or brown or decorated with incised designs of birds, animals, boats, and geometric designs.

d. Large jars with molded animals and decorations serving as spouts or ornamenting the body.

e. Glazed vessels, often in blue or green, appear.

6. Iron Age vessels.

a. ‘‘Palace’’ or ‘‘eggshell’’ wares: thin- walled, fine vessels of buff-grey-green fabric that imitate metallic shapes. Common forms include open bowls, beakers, goblets, dishes, and tall cups with animal-headed base. Approximately 3–40 cm high.

b. Glazed vessels occur, many of which have polychrome decorations of geometric patterns or animals and floral designs. Forms include buckets, jars, and closed bowls. Approximately 8–40 cm high.

7. Hellenistic-Seleucid, Parthian, Sasanian vessels.

a. Most common are unglazed Aramaic incantation bowls of the Sasanian period, painted on the inside surface with long magical texts that surround an image of a bound demon. Sometimes the text is only simulated with squiggles. Other painted and incised unglazed wares, particularly dating to the Parthian period, have Aramaic, Syriac, Mandaic, or Middle Persian inscriptions.

b. Glazed vessels such as jars and vases are also common, occasionally in zoomorphic forms such as tall cups with animal-headed base. Glaze colors include shades of blue, green, and red.

c. Sasanian buff ware is often stamped around the perimeter of the body with stamps that depict animal subjects.

d. Forms of Parthian and Sasanian pottery include: pitchers, jugs, tall two- handled jars, lamps, bowls, pots, flasks, footed bowls, plates, dishes, cups, vases, and bottles. Approximately 10–35 cm high.

8. Umayyad, Abbasid vessels.

a. Molded and stamped earthenware: Oil lamps, bowls, ewers, and jugs, stamped with geometric and simple floral designs. Sometimes they are covered with a green glaze.

b. Blue on White: Small bowls, ewers, jugs, and platters, covered with a bright white glaze embellished with designs in cobalt blue. Typical patterns were floral, abstract, and geometric, and sometimes framed with a festooned edge. Short blessings in Arabic or the potter’s signature were also used as decorative devices.

c. Lusterware: Ceramics with a shiny, lustrous surface design that emulated the effect of precious metal objects. Extant vessels consist of bowls, small flat-bottomed platters, and trays, as well as some ewers and tiles. The designs include floral themes, pairs of wings, and at times highly stylized animals or even awkward-looking humans. Surface patterns were dense and highly abstract.

d. Unglazed wares: Large unglazed water jars with rounded bottoms, covered with relief decoration and combinations of molding, engraving, carving, and piercing. Motifs included ancient gods and their sacred animals as well as court officials and revelers.

E. Architectural Elements

1. Bricks and tiles: Molded, carved, or flat, glazed or unglazed, sets of bricks or tiles were used to veneer the walls of buildings. They can show geometric or floral designs, figured scenes, or inscriptions. Often, many separate bricks fit together to form a larger composition.

2. Plaques: Glazed wall plaques, including square and round examples with protruding knobs, are especially common during the 1st millennium. Approximately 30–45 cm in width/ diameter.

3. Cones: Small to medium-sized cones are found either loose or stuck into wall plaster to form mosaic designs. Their wider end can be painted red or black, or dipped in bitumen. Some are topped with rosettes, either painted or glazed. Approximately 8–20 cm long.

F. Miscellaneous

1. Beads, pendants, amulets, and seals were often made out of ceramic or ceramic-related materials such as faience and glazed ceramic.

2. Sealings are lumps of sun-dried clay that were applied over knotted cords and then impressed with images from cylinder or stamp seals (see II.B and C). They were used to secure jars and other types of containers, bundles, doors, and documents. They often have irregular forms, with the seal impressions on the outer surface, while the inner surface is molded to the shape and texture of the item secured. Inscriptions might be present. Approximately 2–15 cm in width/ diameter.

3. Spindle whorls, usually in the shape of a bi-conic disk and pierced through the axis, can be either sun dried or baked and occur from the Neolithic through Sasanian periods. Approximately 3–6 cm in diameter.

II. Stone

A Introduction

Types most commonly encountered include cylinder and stamp seals (II.B and C), Late Assyrian relief fragments (II.D.5), and chlorite vessels (II.F.4).

B. Cylinder Seals

1. A cylinder seal is a large cylindrical bead with a hole pierced through its vertical axis and engraved images around the outer circumference. These seals can range from extremely small (ca. 2 cm high) to more substantial (ca. 8 cm high), with diameters from 1–3 cm. This is the predominant seal type from the end of the 4th millennium through the 1st millennium BC.

2. Stones for seals vary over time, ranging from soft stones such as marbles and serpentines, to harder ones such as hematite and chalcedony. Semi- precious stones like lapis lazuli, agate, and jasper are also popular. In the later periods (Seleucid through Sasanian), gemstones are popular, including pearl, turquoise, garnet, carnelian, agate, quartz, onyx, sardonyx, heliotrope, jasper, rock crystal, amethyst, hematite, goethite, lapis lazuli, and also glass and metal.

C. Stamp Seals

1. Early periods (Chalcolithic): square, circular (‘‘button’’), lentoid, hemispheric, and ‘‘gable-backed’’ forms carved on one flat surface with engraved geometric designs and/or simple human and animal figures. The square and circular types often have knobs on their top sides. A distinctive type is the stamp seal carved in the shape of an animal such as a reclining cow or sheep, with the sealing surface on the bottom.

2. Late stamp seals (from the 1st millennium BC through the Sasanian period) take several standardized shapes, including eight-sided pyramidal stamps, cones, cameos (carved in raised relief), ellipsoidal or domical seals (sides can be undecorated or decorated), and rings. The flat sealing surface, usually oval or round in shape, is engraved with a wide range of subjects.

D. Relief and Inlay Sculpture

1. Inlay sculpture takes monumental and small-scale forms in the 3rd millennium BC. Monumental examples include friezes of sculpted stone figures set into an inlaid stone or bitumen background. Small-scale examples with flat, cut-out figures in light-colored stones set against dark stone or bitumen backgrounds decorate boxes and furniture. Subjects include narrative scenes such as warfare and banqueting.

2. Square, carved relief plaques (approximately 30–40 cm square), often depicting banqueting scenes in a series of registers arranged around a central hole, are found during the 3rd millennium BC.

3. Large free-standing stone steles, almost always fragmentary, occur from the 3rd through the 1st millennium BC. They are carved with scenes commemorating battles and building projects, and often have inscriptions on them. They can stand over 200 cm high, though most of the fragments are smaller.

4. A type of small stele, the bolder- shaped ‘‘boundary stone’’ of the late 2nd and early 1st millennia BC, is characterized by long inscriptions and multiple carved relief images, some of which have been associated with zodiac signs and divine symbols. Approximately 50 cm high.

5. Late Assyrian relief wall panels lined the walls of palaces and temples. Intact examples can be over 200 cm high, and fragments are common. They depict detailed images of battles, ceremonies, and supernatural beings and plants, and are often inscribed in cuneiform, either directly on the relief imagery or in designated areas.

6. In the Hellenistic-Seleucid and Parthian periods, small altars or architectural models displaying columned settings for figures are carved in a provincial Greco-Roman style. Funerary sculpture, steles, and reliefs (from sarcophagi or architectural units) can depict the deceased alone, banqueting with family members, or in association with the gods.

E. Sculpture in the Round

1. Small carvings consisting of a cylindrical shaft that terminates in the head of a bird, snake, or human date to the early Neolithic period. Approximately 8–22 cm high.

2. Alabaster figurines of nude, standing females carved in an angular, geometric fashion with tall heads and sometimes having inlaid eyes date to the late Neolithic period. Approximately 5– 15 cm high.

3. Small sculptures including animals, especially bulls, and human forms, such as the ‘‘Priest-King’’ figure depicted wearing a tight-fitting cap with a rolled brim, occur in the 4th millennium BC.

4. Votive statues of worshippers— men, women, and couples—some of which bear cuneiform inscriptions on their backs, show the figures either seated or standing with hands clasped and in a frontal position, staring straight ahead. The form is most common in the 3rd millennium BC and assumes more monumental scale later. The earlier statues, typically less than 70 cm high, tend to be from soft white stones like limestone. Larger and later statues, some life-size, use harder stones like diorite.

5. In the Late Assyrian period, gateway sculptures in the form of lions and bulls, often winged, range from diminutive to, more commonly, colossal (up to approximately 450 cm high).

6. In the Hellenistic-Seleucid and Parthian periods, statuary of historical, mythical, or divine figures are executed in two different styles: a provincial Greco-Roman style, and a local style. Stones used include soft limestones and marbles. Approximate sizes range from under-life-size to over-life-size.

a. Statues in the Greco-Roman style stand in a pronounced asymmetrical pose with the weight shifted onto one leg, and often show the human figure as a nude or in Roman military garb.

b. The local style features life-size statues of nobles who stand on inscribed bases and are shown wearing elaborate costumes and jewelry. Local male dress can include a long open jacket over a knee-length tunic and baggy trousers. Often only the heads survive. Also represented are divine and mythological figures, including both Greco-Roman and Iranian types, such as Hercules, Hermes, Aphrodite, Fortuna-Isis, and the moon-god. Figurines, typically of soft stones like alabaster, are also produced. Approximately 20 cm high.

F. Vessels

1. Ground stone vessels occur from the early Neolithic to the Sasanian period.

2. Alabaster miniature vessels date to the late Neolithic period. Forms include small bowls, plates, cups, anthropomorphized jars, and complex forms of unknown purpose.

3. A wide variety of stone vessels, some carved with figural scenes in relief, others inlaid with colored stones to form geometric patterns, marks the later 4th millennium production. Forms include jars with spouts on their shoulders, and tall cylindrical vases.

4. During the 3rd millennium, both imported and locally produced vessels carved from soft stones, such as chlorite and alabaster, appear in a variety of different and unusual shapes and carved relief designs. The chlorite vessels are decorated with a large range of subjects including mythological figures and geometric patterns, and sometimes include colored inlays. Later forms tend to be closed containers of a fairly small size, perhaps meant for cosmetics, and are rarely decorated.

5. Small bottles and larger storage jars of stone appear in the 3rd millennium assemblage. The most common stones used include calcites (limestone, alabaster, and marble), steatites (chlorite and serpentine), and sandstones.

6. Alabaster jars with handles and high, hollow feet are popular in the Late Bronze Age. Semi-precious and extremely hard stones, such as lapis lazuli, agate, onyx, porphyry, and obsidian, are also used. Inscribed examples sometimes occur.

7. Flat-bottomed querns and mortars, often of basalt, form a constant part of the domestic repertoire.

G. Architectural Elements

1. Architecture is constructed from finely dressed stone in the Seleucid through Sasanian periods, including walls, ceilings, gates, doorways, arches, blind windows and niches, engaged columns, pilasters, capitals, architraves, cornices, crenellations, and arcades. Broad expanses of surface were decorated with fluted buttresses and recesses. Larger walls were broken up with bordered paneling, either molded or painted. Column capitals occur in a variety of orders, including Corinthian, Doric, and Ionic.

2. Architectural decoration of both patterned designs and figures adorned buildings in the Seleucid through Sasanian periods, for example at Hatra. a. Architectural relief sculpture may depict frontal male and female Parthian busts, and masks of Greek mythological figures, such as the satyr; larger relief compositions (lintels, beams, wall slabs) feature military or mercantile subjects, the enthroned king, and investiture scenes. b. Decorative motifs on friezes include bead and reel, egg and dart, interlocking geometric designs, Greek key, meanders, vines, acanthus plants, laurels, grapes, palmettes, arcades, human busts and masks, and mythological subjects.

3. Mosaics are created from cut and polished stones in the Seleucid through Sasanian periods. They follow Roman practice with typically Hellenistic themes. 4. Stone mihrabs and other architectural elements in the Islamic period can be carved in relief with elaborate floral, geometric, and calligraphic designs.

H. Inscriptions, Writing

1. Cuneiform inscriptions appear on stone tablets in shapes replicating those of clay tablets.

2. Cuneiform also appears on stone wall slabs, either with or without figural imagery, particularly during the Late Assyrian period. These examples are often fragmentary, with only a few characters on a fragment that has been trimmed to a regular shape.

3. Inscriptions in cuneiform, Aramaic, Greek, and Arabic characters can appear on vessels, sculptural forms, and architectural elements in the later periods.

I. Amulets, Pendants, and Beads

1. Amulets in the earlier periods tend to take the form of animals.

2. Pendants and beads, appearing from the Neolithic period onward, often use semi-precious imported stones, such as lapis lazuli, carnelian, and agate, and take a variety of forms, including barrel- shaped, biconical, and discoid. Approximately 1–4 cm long.

J. Tools and Weapons

1. Stone tools and weapons begin in the Paleolithic period and continue, with changes, through time. Flint and obsidian are popular stones for chipped and flaked tools and weapons, including hand axes, spear points, sickle blade components, and cutting utensils. Sizes can range from just a few centimeters for small blades to 20 cm for large axes.

2. Stone mace-heads, pierced through their long axis, appear during the historical periods and can sometimes be carved with figures in relief or inscribed with cuneiform.

3. Stone weights are found in a variety of shapes, most commonly that of a duck with its head tucked onto its back. Common stone types for weights include hematite and diorite.

III. Metal

A. Introduction: This category includes objects of copper/bronze, iron, gold, silver, and their alloys. Types most commonly encountered include coins (III.B), ‘‘Luristan’’-style weapons and horse bridle fittings (III.C.1 and 2), foundation figurines (III.D.1), and jewelry (III.E).

B. Coins

1. Coins in Iraq have a long history and great variety, spanning the Achaemenid Persian, Hellenistic Seleucid, Parthian, Sasanian, and Islamic periods. Coins from neighboring regions circulated in Iraq as well. Early coins are hand-stamped, so that the design is usually off-center.

2. Achaemenid coins are the gold daric and silver siglos, and fractional and multiple denominations. Both are stamped on the front with an image of the king holding a bow, and on the back with a non-figural oblong mark.

3. Coin types and materials for coins minted or circulated in Iraq during the Seleucid, Parthian, and Sasanian periods include gold staters and dinars, bronze or silver drachms, tetradrachms, and hemidrachms, and smaller bronze and lead coins. These coins usually have male and female busts (of kings and queens) on the front. Seated archers, seated gods such as Zeus, winged Victory, and other Greco-Roman mythological subjects, are usually on the reverse of the Seleucid and Parthian coins, which are inscribed in Greek or Parthian. Sasanian period coins typically feature a fire altar on the back, either with or without figures, and are inscribed in Middle Persian.

4. Early Islamic coins are of gold, silver, and copper. Most are stamped on both sides with inscriptions in Arabic, though a few types have an image on one side and an inscription on the other.

C. Tools and Weapons

1. Copper, bronze, and iron were used to manufacture a wide range of weapons (including so-called ‘‘Luristan’’ types), such as blades, daggers, and axes; and tools, including adzes, points, pins, needles, and fishing hooks. Steel blades for items like swords appear in the 1st millennium AD.

2. Horse-related equipment in bronze includes bits, some of which can be cast in intricate designs (including so-called ‘‘Luristan’’ types), and harness trappings such as blinders and frontlets.

3. Bronze and iron armor occurs, including scales, shields, and helmets. Armor and weapons of the Islamic period can be decorated with arabesque designs and inscriptions.

4. Copper/bronze weights are found in a variety of shapes, including that of a recumbent lion.

D. Sculpture

1. Solid-cast copper/bronze figurines include so-called foundation figurines of standing male figures (sometimes with a peg-shaped lower body and/or carrying a basket on the head), stands in the shape of animals and human figures, and a wide range of small figures. Approximately 10–35 cm high.

2. Hollow-cast copper/bronze large- scale figures occur, of which often only parts such as toes or feet are found, though occasionally more complete examples survive.

3. Sheet copper/bronze was hammered over a core (usually of wood and now lost) and secured with rivets to create large-scale architectural sculpture.

4. Strips of bronze decorated in relief with narrative images were nailed to wooden doors of the Late Assyrian period.

E. Jewelry and Personal Ornaments

1. Gold, Electrum, and Silver

a. Metalworking techniques include hammering, gilding, casting, filigree, granulation, and cloisonné. Simple forms of bangles appear in almost all periods.

b. Early jewelry includes simple beads, pendants in forms such as animals and insects, spirals, wire, bands, rosettes, and hairpins.

c. Exceptionally rich burials of the Early Bronze Age from Ur have produced elaborate necklaces, headdresses, and ornaments, including gold and silver ribbons, gold leaf-shaped pendants, beads, and pins, sometimes set with semiprecious stones.

d. Exceptionally rich burials of the Late Assyrian period from Nimrud have produced outstanding examples of jewelry, including heavy gold bracelets inlaid with semi-precious stones, inlaid earrings, cast gold armlets with zoomorphic terminals, gold fibulae, cut out appliqués, gold mounted stamp seals, and an elaborate gold headdress with floral elements created in gold leaf and beadwork.

e. Elaborate jewelry continues during the Seleucid through Sasanian periods, including finger rings, earrings, diadems, and pendants. Seleucid and Parthian jewelry is mostly of gold or gold plate, less frequently of silver or bronze. It is often inlaid with precious gems or glass imitations set in raised flanges.

2. Copper/Bronze

a. Simple bracelets, anklets, and rings occur in copper and bronze in all periods.

b. Small beads and simple trinkets in copper appear as early as the 9th millennium BC.

c. Mirrors, tweezers, and razors appear by the 3rd millennium BC.

d. Fibulae (triangular safety pins for garments) appear in the 1st millennium BC and become standard ornaments thereafter.

3. Iron

Small pieces of native iron were used as ornaments before the 1st millennium BC and include items such as beads, bracelets, and pendants.

F. Vessels

1. Copper/Bronze

a. Bronze is commonly used for utilitarian items such as vessels from the end of the 3rd millennium through the 1st millennium BC.

b. Shallow bronze bowls of ‘‘Phoenician’’ and ‘‘Syrian’’ styles from the Late Assyrian period bear concentric rings of complex imagery on their outside (they also occur in silver and gilt silver).

c. Large bronze cauldrons and cauldron stands begin to be produced in the 1st millennium BC, some of which include cast decorations in the shape of bulls, griffins, or human heads.

d. ‘Bath-tub’-shaped bronze coffins appear beginning in the 1st millennium BC.

e. Ewers with bulbous bodies, long necks and handles were produced in the Sasanian and Abbasid periods.

f. Copper-alloy metalwork in the Islamic period can be engraved with inscriptions and elaborate floral and geometric designs, sometimes with enamel inlays. Forms include bowls, ewers, candlesticks, and astrolabes.

g. Copper-alloy metalwork inlaid with silver began to appear in the 13th century AD. The shapes include ewers, basins, boxes, incense burners, and pen boxes, which are notable for their frequent representation of princes and a wide variety of scenes, inspired by manuscript illustration. Metalwork from Mosul also stands out for its inclusion of ‘‘genre scenes,’’ such as shepherds with their flocks, boys shooting at birds, etc. These scenes, which vary in size, are separated by decorative patterns.

2. Gold, Electrum, and Silver

a. Vessels in these metals are known primarily from the Early Bronze Age, the Late Assyrian period, and the Seleucid through Sasanian periods. Forms for vessels include fluted tumblers and bowls, spouted vessels, shallow bowls and plates, and handled jugs and jars. Decorative techniques include repoussé, chasing, engraving, and appliqué. Some carry inscriptions.

b. During the Seleucid through Sasanian periods, vessels are typically in silver, less frequently in bronze or gold. Designs on silver vessels are sometimes overlaid in gold plate. Forms include platters (with royal themes, usually a hunt on horseback or on foot), bowls, ewers (with domestic or religious themes and decorative elements), pitchers, handled ‘‘tea’’ cups, and tall cups with animal-head bases.

c. Sasanian decoration is organized by central medallions (usually having a beaded or floral border) and flanking scrollwork. Themes inside medallions include griffins, antelopes, stags, rams, eagles, flowers, dancing girls in arcades, and human busts. Common techniques for fashioning vessels include hammering, repoussé, casting small elements, and chasing.

G. Miscellaneous

1. Furniture parts, such as chair legs, struts, and openwork panels, were cast and hammered in copper/bronze.

2. Architectural elements in copper/ bronze include door-pivots, knobs, and nails.

3. Silver coils, rings, ingots, and scrap served as a form of pre-coinage currency.

4. Some utilitarian forms were copied in precious metal for ceremonial purposes, such as gold weapons and tools.

5. Gold and silver leaf were used to cover a number of different types of objects, including parts of lyres, such as bull head ornaments.

6. Ritual and ecclesiastical objects pertaining to Iraq’s religious communities include, but are not limited to, crosses, chalices, kiddush cups, candelabra, and Torah pointers.

IV. Glass

A. Introduction The type most commonly encountered is Sasanian vessels (IV.B.3), which are often misrepresented as Roman glass.

B. Vessels

1. Early glass is opaque or translucent, in imitation of semi-precious stones. One type of vessel is made of bands of colored glass (predominantly blue, with white, yellow, orange, and pale blue), often shaped into festoons and other patterns. Another type is mosaic glass, created by fusing multicolored glass disks. Forms include beakers, flasks, small bottles, small handled jars, hemispherical bowls, goblets, plates, and small jugs. Approximately 6–20 cm high.

2. Transparent glass appears in the 1st millennium BC. Types include blown transparent vessels, and colored glass that is pulled, cut and mold-made. Techniques of decorating glass include molded, cut, and engraved designs.

3. Small blown-glass bottles in a variety of shapes, colors, and patterns are very common in the Sasanian period. They may be iridescent, and are often mistaken for Roman glass.

4. Small, relatively thick-bodied bottles used to store perfume and other types of cosmetics are typical of the Early Islamic period.

5. Bottles blown in a mold with a counter-sunk pattern are another Early Islamic type.

6. Thin-bodied blue glassware decorated with luster painted designs, often inspired by Late Antique motifs such as scrolling vines, is the most important luxury type of glass from the Abbasid period. Shapes include cups, bowls, and plates.

C. Miscellaneous

1. Glass beads are common in both single color and multicolored types.

2. Small figurines, pieces of jewelry, and inserts for inlay into larger items such as ivories can be of mold-formed glass.

3. Tiles for inlay into architecture and furniture can be made of glass, sometimes multicolored.

4. Occasional lumps and ingots of raw unworked glass as well as glass slag occur.

5. Seals (see II.B and C) were sometimes made from glass.

6. Mosaic fragments from Seleucia can be made from multicolored glass tesserae. They show the same designs and techniques as those of stone mosaics.

7. Glass weights date to the Umayyad period and consist of either ring or disk weights inscribed with short texts.

V. Ivory, Bone, and Shell

A. Introduction The type most commonly encountered is carved ivory sculptures and inlays (V.B.1).

B. Sculpture

1. Ivory, bone, and shell were all popular materials for carved furniture inlays (solid plaques and cut-out elements), harness trappings such as blinders and frontlets, and freestanding small sculptures (typically of human or animal figures). Ivory was often covered with precious metal overlays or carved to take colored stone, glass, or faience inlays.

2. Inlays of shell were used with other materials to create figural panels in the 3rd millennium BC. Shell was also used as inlays for the eyes of freestanding sculptures. Simple geometric shapes, such as diamonds, were inlaid into architectural features like columns in several periods.

3. Giant clam shells were polished and engraved with intricate linear designs in the Late Assyrian period.

C. Tools

1. Bone implements such as pins, needles, awls, and small spoons or spatulas appear in all periods.

2. Handles of bone and ivory were used on implements like mirrors, knives, daggers, and swords.

3. Folding ‘‘writing boards’’ of ivory consist of hinged pairs of rectangular panels whose inner surfaces were recessed in order to hold wax.

D. Seals and Personal Ornaments

1. Cylinder seals (see II.B) can be made from the inner spiral of conch shells.

2. Ivory combs are a common luxury item.

3. Beads, pendants, and amulets were also commonly made from all three materials. Different kinds of shells were often used in their original forms as personal ornaments, evident from perforations made in them for attachment or suspension. Rings and bangles were cut from shells.

E. Vessels

1. Containers carved from elephant ivory typically take a cylindrical shape when cut directly from the tusk.

2. Large shells (up to 30 cm long) were sometimes trimmed and incised or decorated with inlays and overlays to create spouted vessels.

3. Other shells, such as bivalves, were used as cosmetic containers. The interior may be stained or still contain powdery material.

VI. Stucco

A. Molded and carved stucco reliefs occur in the Sasanian period, featuring geometric, human, animal, and floral motifs, often set in pearl-bordered roundels or medallions. They could be painted, including shades of red, blue, yellow, turquoise, green, and brown.

B. Samarra Stucco Relief Styles (Early Islamic Period)

1. Samarra A consists of deeply carved vine designs with deep ‘‘eyes,’’ usually organized in long bands as well as simple rectangles and polygons.

2. Samarra B, also deeply carved, comprises a greater number of designs and motifs, which are covered with small notches and dots.

3. Samarra C has molded designs made up of endless repetition of lines and spirals, which are beveled, i.e., they meet the surface at an oblique angle.

VII. Painting

A. Introduction: The category most commonly encountered is modern Iraqi paintings (VII.B).

B. Iraqi paintings of the 20th century exemplify a very wide range of modern styles, techniques, and subjects. They are highly regarded by collectors and are greatly in demand throughout the Arab world and beyond. Numerous examples have been stolen from Iraqi public and private collections since 2003. Stolen paintings may be marked on the back with the former Saddam Center for the Arts seal, inventory numbers, or suspicious and sloppy dark paint intended to cover the seal or inventory numbers. Any painting that could possibly have an Iraqi connection should be examined by experts in modern Iraqi art.

C. Painting on plastered walls appears starting in the 4th millennium BC. Colors most commonly follow a palette of black, red, yellow, and white. Geometric and floral patterns occur as well as figural designs including animals and humans. Painted plaster fragments can be quite small in size.

D. Painted plaster walls of the Seleucid through Sasanian periods use a provincial Roman style to depict royal and religious themes, including the king seated before audience, the hunt, military themes such as archers on horseback and cavalrymen, and Jewish, Christian, Roman Mithraic, Hellenic and Babylonian religious subjects. Marble paneling and architectural forms are also imitated in paint. Graffiti in red- brown and black paint also occurs.

E. Ceramic tiles and bricks may be decorated with painted subjects or patterns (see I.E.1).

VIII. Textiles

A. Clothing fragments from the Seleucid and Parthian periods include linen, wool, cotton, silk, and felt. Some examples have gold embellishments (plaques) or gold thread. Linen and cotton are usually undyed and made in simple weaves. Wool can be decorated with richly dyed embroidery or woven into twills for cloaks, tunics, trousers, and wall hangings.

B. Sasanian textile remains include cheap hemp, wool, linen, cotton, flax, silk. Designs are elaborately woven or embroidered and usually include figural elements set in pearl-bordered roundels or medallions.

C. Wool pile and knotted carpet fragments dating from the Hellenistic through Sasanian periods display both Hellenistic Greek and Iranian motifs and designs.

D. Medieval Iraq was an important center for textile production but most examples are fragmentary. These include tapestry woven woolen fabrics, cotton, and silk. Many of the extant silk and cotton fabrics include embroidered Kufic benedictory inscriptions and at times include the name of the patron or ruler.

E. In the 13th century, Baghdad and Mosul produced textiles decorated with roundels surrounding real or imaginary creatures in symmetrical arrangements.

IX. Paper, Parchment, Leather

A. Introduction: The types most commonly encountered are books and documents (IX.B).

B. Manuscripts, Books, and Documents: Numerous manuscripts, books, and documents have been stolen from Iraqi public and private collections since 2003. Any manuscript, book, or document that could possibly have an Iraqi connection should be examined by experts.

C. Leather and Parchment (sometimes with inscriptions) occasionally survive from the Pre-Islamic period.

D. Qur’ans on Parchment

1. Iraq was one of the main centers for the production of early Qur’ans. Until the 11th century, Qur’ans were written on parchment (animal skin) rather than paper, and most have been taken apart.

2. Each Qur’an consisted of multiple ‘‘quires,’’ sets of five sheets of parchment folded in the middle and sewn together along the crease, to make a total of ten pages. They were usually horizontal in format. Bindings consisted of wooden boards covered with brown leather and stamped with simple geometric designs.

3. Early Qur’ans were written in the so-called Kufic, or angular, script, made up of relatively short vertical and long horizontal strokes. They were devoid of any decoration, except for red vowel marks.

4. By the 9th century, chapter heading were distinguished by colored bands, often terminating in palmettes, and these designs became increasingly more elaborate.

5. Soon gold ink became the preferred color for decorative devices, and many Qur’ans would begin and end with one or several folio(s) of gold geometric design, referred to as frontispieces and finispieces, respectively.

6. At times, groups of colored dots and 1–3 small dots or dashes were included within the body of the text as aids to pronunciation.

E. Qur’ans on Paper

1. Qur’ans after the 11th century became taller in format and were written on paper.

2. They were copied in a variety of more legible cursive scripts and incorporated elaborate illumination, such as rosettes marking verses within the text, and lavishly decorated frontispieces.

3. ‘‘Monumental’’ manuscripts of the Qur’an in multiple volumes were made in Baghdad during the latter half of the 13th and first half of the 14th centuries.

F. Torahs on Parchment: There have been active Jewish communities in Iraq since at least 586 BC. Torahs used by these communities are parchment scrolls bearing Hebrew writing in black ink. The scroll is wound around two wooden rods, and metal finials may cover the tops of the rods. The Torah is housed in a cylindrical case of wood that may be decorated with inscriptions and/or semi-precious stones. Approximately 100 cm high.

G. Illustrated Manuscripts

1. Baghdad was one of the most significant centers for the production of illustrated scientific and poetic manuscripts during the Islamic medieval period. The images, painted with opaque watercolor on paper, included figurative representations, such as idealized portraits of the author or the royal patron, which would appear as the frontispiece to the manuscript.

2. In other examples, paintings were dispersed within the text as illustrations. In most instances, the landscape elements were kept to a minimum and the emphasis was on human interaction.

X. Wood

A. Furniture, doors, pulpits, coffins, and other wooden articles in the Islamic period can be decorated with elaborate carved or inlaid designs, including floral and geometric patterns, grape clusters, and inscriptions.

B. Wood beams from decorated buildings may be carved with patterns and inscriptions.

C. Wood panels in the Islamic period can be covered with stucco and gilding.

D. Ritual and ecclesiastical objects pertaining to Iraq’s religious communities include, but are not limited to, Qur’an stands (often carved or inlaid) and Torah scroll cases (see IX.F).

Inapplicability of Notice and Delayed Effective Date

Under section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (‘‘APA’’) (5 U.S.C. 553), agencies amending their regulations generally are required to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register that solicits public comment on the proposed amendments, consider public comments in deciding on the final content of the final amendments, and publish the final amendments at least 30 days prior to their effective date. However, section 553(a)(1) of the APA provides that the standard prior notice and comment procedures do not apply to agency rulemaking that involves the foreign affairs function of the United States. CBP has determined that this final rule involves the foreign affairs function of the United States as it implements authority granted to the President under the Emergency Protection for Iraqi Cultural Antiquities Act of 2004 and § 304 of the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2603) to impose import restrictions on archaeological or ethnological material of Iraq. The former Act is in response to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483, and both the legislation and this rule do no more than to carry out the obligations of the United States under the 1970 UNESCO Convention and Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. Accordingly, the rulemaking requirements under the APA do not apply and this final rule will be effective upon publication.

In addition, § 553(b)(B) of the APA provides that notice and public procedure are not required when an agency for good cause finds them impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to public interest. CBP has determined that providing prior notice and public procedure for these regulations would be impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest because immediate action is necessary to respond to the pillage of Iraqi cultural antiquities and to avoid damage to those antiquities in Iraq until hostilities have ceased. Any delay in this action will likely result in further damage to the Iraqi cultural antiquities that Congress was seeking to protect with the Emergency Protection for Iraqi Cultural Antiquities Act of 2004.

Finally, § 553(d)(3) of the APA permits agencies to make a rule effective less than 30 days after publication when the agency finds that good cause exists for dispensing with a delayed effective date. For the reasons described above, CBP finds that good cause exists to make these regulations effective without a delayed effective date.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.

Executive Order 12866

CBP has determined that this document is not a regulation or rule subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (58 FR 51735, October 1993), because it pertains to a foreign affairs function of the United States, as described above, and therefore is specifically exempted by section 3(d)(2) of Executive Order 12866.

Signing Authority

This document is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(a)(1), pertaining to the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury (or his/her delegate) to approve regulations related to certain customs revenue functions.

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 12

Cultural property, Customs duties and inspection, Imports, Prohibited merchandise.

Amendment to CBP Regulations

I For the reasons set forth above, part 12 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR part 12), is amended as set forth below:


I 1. The general authority citation for part 12 continues to read, and specific authority for new § 12.104j is added to read, as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)), 1624;

* * * * *

Section 12.104j also issued under Pub. L. 108–429, 118 Stat. 2600; 19 U.S.C. 2612;

* * * * *

I 2. Add a new § 12.104j to read as follows:

§12.104j Emergency protection for Iraqi cultural antiquities.

(a) Restriction. Importation of archaeological or ethnological material of Iraq is restricted pursuant to the Emergency Protection for Iraqi Cultural Antiquities Act of 2004 (title III of Pub. L. 108–429) and section 304 of the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2603).

(b) Description of restricted material. The term ‘‘archaeological or ethnological material of Iraq’’ means cultural property of Iraq and other items of archaeological, historical, cultural, rare scientific, or religious importance illegally removed from the Iraq National Museum, the National Library of Iraq, and other locations in Iraq, since the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 661 of 1990. CBP Decision 08–17 sets forth the Designated List of Archaeological and Ethnological Material of Iraq that describes the types of specific items or categories of archaeological or ethnological material that are subject to import restrictions.

Jayson P. Ahern,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Approved: April 24, 2008.

Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E8–9343 Filed 4–29–08; 8:45 am]

This is the full text of the document published in Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 84/Wednesday, April 30, 2008/Rules and Regulations, pages 23335-23342

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

American School of Classical Studies at Athens: Digitization Projects

Here is the program (in Greek) for the launch presentation of the work accomplished since July 2006 by ASCSA staff with the assistance of teams from the Lambrakis Foundation and RACTI, University of Patras, in the digitization of materials from the Gennadius Library, ASCSA Archives, and Ancient Corinth and their presentation through an internet “cultural portal” and four multimedia educational modules.

Further information, and eventually the database and "eucational modules" themselves, will be accessible in the Digital Library section of the website of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Electronic Monograph discussion

An interesting diiscussion between Harrison Eiteljorg, editor of the e-journal CSA Newsletter, and Judith Winters, editor of the e-journal Internet Archaeology is emerging here.

[Originaly posted April 4, 2008, updated on May 5, 2008. This very interesting discussion continues at the commentary page for H. Eiteljorg, II The Electronic Monograph: A Scholarly Necessity or the Never-Reached Pot of Gold at the End of the Rainbow? in Vol. XX, No. 3, Winter 2008 of the CSA Newsletter

I know there a members of AWBG who are planning electronic monograph. Comment from them and others is welcome here.

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Digital Classicist Work-in-Progress seminars (London)

Digital Classicist Work-in-Progress seminars
Institute of Classical Studies

Fridays at 16:30 in NG16, Senate House, Malet St, London, WC1E 7HU
(June 20th, July 4th-18th seminars in room B3, Stewart House)
(June 27th seminar room 218, Chadwick Bdg, UCL, Gower Street)


6 June (NG16): Elaine Matthews and Sebastian Rahtz (Oxford), The Lexicon of Greek Personal Names and classical web services

13 June (NG16) Brent Seales (University of Kentucky), EDUCE: Non-invasive scanning for classical materials

20 June (STB3) Dot Porter (University of Kentucky), The Son of Suda On Line: a next generation collaborative editing tool

27 June (UCL Chadwick 218) Bruce Fraser (Cambridge), The value and price of information: reflections on e-publishing in the humanities

4 July (STB3) Andrew Bevan (UCL), Computational Approaches to Human and Animal Movement in the Archaeological Record

11 July (STB3) Frances Foster (KCL), A digital presentation of the text of Servius

18 July (STB3) Ryan Bauman (University of Kentucky), Towards the Digital Squeeze: 3-D imaging of inscriptions and curse tablets

25 July (NG16) Charlotte Tupman (KCL), Markup of the epigraphy and archaeology of Roman Libya

1 Aug (NG16) Juan Garcés (British Library), Digitizing the oldest complete Greek Bible: The Codex Sinaiticus project

8 Aug (NG16) Charlotte Roueché (KCL), From Stone to Byte

15 Aug (NG16) Ioannis Doukas (KCL), Towards a digital publication for the Homeric Catalogue of Ships

22 Aug (NG16) Peter Heslin (Durham), Diogenes: Past development and future plans


We are inviting both students and established researchers involved in the application of the digital humanities to the study of the ancient world to come and introduce their work. The focus of this seminar series is the interdisciplinary and collaborative work that results at the interface of expertise in Classics or Archaeology and Computer Science.

The seminar will be followed by wine and refreshments.

Audio recordings and slideshows will be uploaded after each event.

(Sponsored by the Institute of Classical Studies, University of London, and the Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King’s College London.)

For more information please contact or, or visit the seminar website at